无障碍·translate·翻訳·二维码.cn/i3h.cn/4070

---

·搜一搜.cn/Dutch collector tells court he 'no longer owns Chinese mummy'

最新海外#章公祖师#追索案情报道：

荷兰藏家告诉法院：他不再拥有“中国肉身佛”
Dutch collector tells court he 'no longer owns Chinese mummy':3hjj.cn/4070


The Buddha statue on display in Budapest in March 2015. The Zhanggong Patriarch, which contains the 1,000-year-old mummified remains of a monk, disappeared from a temple in the Chinese village of Yangchun in late 1995.PHOTO: REUTERS
PUBLISHED 2 HOURS AGO

之前报道：
Fight over ancient Chinese mummy goes to Dutch court:

3hjj.cn/4054



AMSTERDAM (AFP) - A fight over ownership of a 1,000-year-old mummified monk opened in a Dutch court on Friday (July 14), with an art collector saying he no longer possessed the controversial statue said to contain the mummy.

The small eastern Chinese village of Yangchun has accused Dutch collector Oscar van Overeem of having bought the stolen Buddha statue containing the remains of a monk in Hong Kong in 1996.

But Van Overeem told the Amsterdam District Court the statue was now in the "possession of a businessman who wants to remain anonymous" after a art swop in 2015.


He declined to name the businessman.


"It was a verbal deal," lawyer Turan Teke told the judge, adding his client only knew the businessman's "international English name" without giving further details.

The human-sized Buddha statue sitting in a lotus position, called the "Zhanggong Patriarch", disappeared from a temple in Yangchun in late 1995 after being worshipped there for centuries.



Missing for two decades, the Buddha statue resurfaced when villagers in 2015 recognised it as part of a display at the "Mummy World Exhibition" at Budapest's Natural History Museum.

The statue was subsequently withdrawn.

A scan of the statue revealed a skeleton inside - said to be that of the monk who lived nearly a millenium ago during China's Song dynasty.

The villagers "without a doubt recognised the statue when they saw it," their lawyer Jan Holthuis told the court.

The relatives of the monk - whom Holthuis says have written proof of their family ties - are asking the court to rule that they are entitled to have their ancestor returned to his rightful place.

Holthuis is using an argument under Dutch law that says "a person is not allowed to have a known body in their possession" to get the statue back.

He also presented a slew of other arguments intending to show that the statute bought by Van Overeem is indeed the one stolen from the temple.

After three hours of technical discussions, presiding judge Jeroen Thomas asked both parties to submit new written statements.

The judge will now also decide whether Van Overeem should disclose the name of the anonymous businessman, Holthuis told AFP after the hearing.

"This will take a few months," he added.

The case is being closely watched as it could mark one of the first successful retrievals of Chinese relics in court, the state-run Chinese newspaper Global Times reported on Tuesday.

Previously similar retrievals have been done through diplomatic channels, the paper said.

Beijing in recent years has vehemently protested the sale of artefacts it says were stolen, particularly in the 19th century when European powers began encroaching on Chinese territory.


另据一网荷兰报道：

荷京法庭今审中国人向荷兰藏家索回肉身坐佛案六星期后裁决

荷兰阿姆斯特丹法庭今天正式审理中国福建阳春村村民向荷兰藏家索还章公祖师肉身佛像的案件，荷兰电讯报记者Mascha de Jong以社交媒体作了现场直播的报道。

关于此案的背景，请参考3月14日本网刊登的新华社新闻。

电讯报的报道说，听证从荷兰时间下午1时30分开始，安排在Van Namenzaal庭审理。原告方的村民并没有出席，委托荷兰律师Jan Holthuis诉讼。

佛像1995年12月14日在阳春村被盗，荷兰收藏者Oscar van Overeem是在数月后从一名古董商人Rustenburg处以交换的方式收藏，称是用三尊佛像换取了这尊佛像，因而没有购物单据。

但是，根据中国的文物保护法，佛像是非法走私出境的。  

关键的一个问题是，佛像现在何处？原告的荷兰律师马上提出问题。

但是，Oscarvan Overeem说已经换走了，他没有说出佛像现在何处，是谁换走的。但是，他在法庭上说，是2015年12月21日换走的，只知道是个华人投资者。

http://www.straitstimes.com/world/dutch-collector-tells-court-he-no-longer-owns-chinese-mummy

不过，2016年4月16日，Oscar van Overeem在邮件中说：我可以代表现在的持有人，对佛像采取行动，作出决定。

被告的律师Teken则质疑村民的诉讼身份，称是中国政府在背后指挥。还说，换走佛像的华人，只有英文名，不知道其中文名字，也不知道他的住址。双方交易是口头协议，因此，也没有书面协议，没有邮件往来。不过，法庭上，甚至连所称换走佛像的华人英文名字他也没有说出来。

在法庭上，Oscar van Overeem也否认其拥有的佛像就是阳春村村民失窃的那一尊，因为“有点不同”。

他描述换走佛像的这名华人“有一定年纪，很安详，对中国国内外情况很熟悉，是个艺术行家。”他说，从这个华人手中他得到了另外的很精美的雕像，否认索取2000万至3000万欧元。他还说，假如日后有官司，由新主人处理。

法庭认为，最好能把现在的主人请出来，一起参与讨论。但是，Oscar van Overeem再次表示，没有可能，因为这个人“希望匿名”。

经过长达3个小时的庭审，法庭辩论结束。

荷兰媒体说，法庭将于6个星期后作出宣判。